Yes, the building permit for the extension dates back 1992.So when it was built when the new requirements were not yet in effect. What does this mean, can I say that it has already been defined as a public channel and therefore has been taken into account in the planning rules when they built the extension? So we are close to the exchange and the research has identified a public sewer that works at the back of the house. It is a 1930s house and the expansion was built in the 1990s. There`s a building permit. The well is just outside the wall of the extension cord, perhaps a foot from here. My lawyer asked the seller`s lawyer to tell us if they have a construction contract, but seem unlikely. I understand that you can build in a guilty way, but it seems that since I have been inquiring about this issue with the water supplier, we are not in a position to remove it now, as has just been announced. I am puzzled as to what we will do next if there is no construction on the agreement. We love the house and we have already invested time and money to get to this point. Has anyone experienced anything about it and have you been able to solve it? I`m grateful for your insight. The housing recidivism situation and the lack of building permits appear to be insurance for compensation. However, as commercial real estate lawyers know, insurance is much more expensive when it comes to commercial real estate.
The answer is not clear. The costs of studying the history of sewers under the ground must be incurred to meet the situation, or the costs must be borne by obtaining a compensation policy. One way or another, this is an uncomfortable situation that has not contemplated the transfer of the regulation to private channels and will probably only be more frequent, since real estate that would have been private before 2011 is now falling above the public. There is another problem as to whether there should have been an agreement. In cases where public sewers were built without the consent required under the 2010 Construction Code, the usual penalties and enforcement measures apply. It will be difficult and time-consuming to determine whether the canal in question was originally a private sewer subject to the transfer of the private sewer regulation in 2011, and therefore it would never have been necessary to enter into a construction agreement, or whether the sewers in question were still public and whether a hold-up should have been carried out. All water companies have legal rights to access public sewers on private land. These include sewers located under or near a property. If the construction permit has been granted by a canal, Severn Trent will still attempt to reach the canal without disturbing the terrain.